Defined Project
A specific training outcome with a clear start and end. Scoped around audience, delivery level and the evidence expected at completion.
Commercial clarity
MILD does not publish fixed prices, because scope determines cost. This page explains, at an executive level, what actually drives scope so you can judge fit and prepare an internal case before a proposal exists.
What drives scope:
These are the variables discussed in scoping. Together they determine effort, duration, delivery depth and the evidence an engagement can reasonably produce.
How many people are involved, how many locations, shifts or business units, and whether the audience is a single team, a manager population or an enterprise workforce.
Whether training can be built in structured sessions or has to be practiced against live operating conditions, regulated processes or customer-facing work.
Depth of application, interactivity and organizational integration required. Higher levels take more design, more facilitation time and more manager involvement.
Scenario design, simulation and role-based practice built on your own conditions require more development effort than generic materials.
How far the measurement progression is carried, from participation and training through application, performance and business evidence, and what data access that requires.
Whether the work includes training diagnostics, training intelligence, executive advisory or governance design alongside delivery.
Scheduling across operations, multiple cohorts, internal facilitator enablement, accessibility requirements, systems and reporting expectations, and internal review cycles.
Whether the engagement is a defined project, a phased build or an ongoing managed function, and how it sequences against operational capacity.
Engagement shapes:
Scope usually resolves into one of three shapes. The engagement model is a separate decision, covered in the engagement model comparison.
A specific training outcome with a clear start and end. Scoped around audience, delivery level and the evidence expected at completion.
Sequenced phases where each phase produces usable training and informs the next. Used when scale or operational capacity makes a single push unrealistic.
Outsourced or co-sourced learning and development capacity operating continuously against an agreed scope and service expectations.
What MILD will not do:
The first deliverable of any MILD conversation is clarity about the training problem. That is useful even if no engagement follows.
Getting to a proposal:
Establish the business priority, the workforce challenge and the constraints that matter.
Clarify audience scale, delivery level, application complexity, measurement scope and sequencing.
A recommended shape covering model, training areas, delivery levels and measurement approach.
Pricing, statement of work and contracting are handled directly with your organization outside this website.
Common questions:
Related:
The MILD Method, delivery levels and the measurement progression.
Learn moreAccountability, reporting, boundaries and stated limitations.
Learn moreTraining areas and representative programs by delivery level.
Learn moreA structured starting point when the gap is not yet defined.
Learn moreAn executive conversation is enough to establish whether a MILD engagement fits and what scoping would involve.
Request an Executive Consultation, and work from the evidence toward the right response.